View Agenda for this meeting
View Action Summary for this meeting

REGULAR MEETING - ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
CITY OF NOVI
TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 10, 2009

Proceedings had and testimony taken in the matters of the ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS, at City of Novi, 45175 West Ten Mile Road, Novi, Michigan, Tuesday, February 10, 2009.

BOARD MEMBERS
Mav Sanghvi, Chairperson
Gerald Bauer
Victor Cassis
David Ghannam
Rickie Ibe
Linda Krieger
Wayne Wrobel

ALSO PRESENT:
Elizabeth Kudla, City Attorney
Charles Boulard, Building Official

REPORTED BY:
Mona L. Talton, Certified Shorthand Reporter.

1 Novi, Michigan

2 Tuesday, February 10, 2009

3 7:00 p.m.

4 - - - - - -

5 CHAIRPERSON SANGHVI: The clock says 7

6 p.m. and I would like to call to order the

7 February 10th, 2009 meeting of Zoning Board

8 of Appeals of City of Novi.

9 Will you please call the roll.

10 MR. BOULARD: Member Bauer?

11 MEMBER BAUER: Present.

12 MR. BOULARD: Member Sanghvi?

13 CHAIRPERSON SANGHVI: Here.

14 MR. BOULARD: Member Wrobel?

15 MEMBER WROBEL: Present.

16 MR. BOULARD: Member Skelcy?

17 CHAIRPERSON SANGHVI: Absent excused.

18 MR. BOULARD: Member Ghannam?

19 MEMBER GHANNAM: Present.

20 MR. BOULARD: Member Krieger?

21 MEMBER KRIEGER: Present.

22 MR. BOULARD: Member Ibe?

23 MEMBER IBE: Present.

24 MR. BOULARD: Member Cassis?

 

4

1 MEMBER CASSIS: Here.

2 CHAIRPERSON SANGHVI: Very good. Will

3 you please rise and join me in the pledge of

4 allegiance. Mr. Cassis, will you please

5 lead us.

6 MEMBER CASSIS: I sure will.

7 BOARD MEMBERS: I pledge allegiance to

8 the flag of the United States of America and

9 to the Republic for which is stands, one

10 nation under God indivisible with liberty

11 and justice for all.

12 CHAIRPERSON SANGHVI: We do have a

13 quorum and the meeting is now in session.

14 Before I go into further details, I would

15 like to introduce Mr. Victor Cassis who is

16 joining us as a representative from the

17 Planning Commission. Welcome, Mr. Cassis.

18 MEMBER CASSIS: Thank you fellow

19 Rotarian, Mr. Sanghvi. It's very exciting

20 to be elevated to this high forum. And may

21 I say I'm really excited and it's a

22 privilege to be joining my good friend, the

23 legendary Gerald Bauer on the same forum.

24 And believe me, coming here with my

 

5

1 former colleague on the Planning Commission,

2 Wayne Wrobel, there is no scheme or plot to

3 take over this body by the Planning

4 Commission. So, it's great to be with you

5 deliberating the very exciting cases. Thank

6 you.

7 CHAIRPERSON SANGHVI: Thank you. You

8 are very welcome.

9 MEMBER BAUER: You are welcome, sir.

10 CHAIRPERSON SANGHVI: Getting back to

11 the business. Okay. I would like to go

12 over the rules of conduct it appears nobody

13 is here to listen to, but you can find them

14 on the agenda.

15 Just a friendly reminder, please turn

16 off all cell phones and pagers.

17 Individual applicants may take five

18 minutes and groups may take up to 10 minutes

19 to address the Board. The Zoning Board of

20 Appeals is a Hearing Board empowered by the

21 Novi City Charter to hear applicants seeking

22 variances from the application of Novi

23 Zoning Ordinances. It takes a vote of at

24 least four members to approve a variance

 

6

1 request and a vote of a majority of members

2 present to deny a variance.

3 Now, let us look at the agenda. Are

4 there any changes to the agenda? Mr.

5 Boulard?

6 MR. BOULARD: I don't have any

7 changes.

8 MEMBER BAUER: Motion to approve.

9 MEMBER GHANNAM: Seconded.

10 CHAIRPERSON SANGHVI: A motion has

11 been made and seconded to approve the

12 agenda. Those in favor please say aye?

13 BOARD MEMBERS: Aye.

14 CHAIRPERSON SANGHVI: Opposed same

15 sign? We have an agenda.

16 We also have minutes from the January

17 2009 meeting. Are there any changes,

18 additions, deletions in the minutes?

19 MS. KUDLA: Through the Chair, I have

20 a change on page 97 paragraphs 13 and 14.

21 In both paragraphs where it indicates

22 non-confirming use I would have that amended

23 to non-conforming use. Those are my only

24 changes.

 

7

1 CHAIRPERSON SANGHVI: Yes, Mr. Ibe?

2 MEMBER IBE: Yes, I do have a -- thank

3 you, Mr. Chair, by the way. I do have a

4 change on top of page 39. It has in

5 parenthesis unintelligible. The word should

6 be variance. Thank you.

7 CHAIRPERSON SANGHVI: Anybody else? I

8 had noted one error in Mr. Bowman's part on

9 page 77 line 19 it reads in here it is two

10 basic tenants. What he meant was tenets.

11 If you can just correct that.

12 Well, anything else? Any other

13 additions, deletions, corrections? Seeing

14 none, may I have a motion to adopt the

15 corrected minutes?

16 MEMBER GHANNAM: So moved.

17 CHAIRPERSON SANGHVI: So moved. And

18 second?

19 MEMBER KRIEGER: Second.

20 CHAIRPERSON SANGHVI: Okay. The

21 motion has been made and seconded. Will you

22 please call the roll.

23 MR. BOULARD: For the record, the

24 motion maker?

 

8

1 MEMBER GHANNAM: I moved.

2 MR. BOULARD: And the second was?

3 CHAIRPERSON SANGHVI: Linda, Ms.

4 Krieger.

5 MR. BOULARD: Thank you.

6 Member Cassis?

7 MEMBER CASSIS: Yes.

8 MR. BOULARD: Member Ibe?

9 MEMBER IBE: Yes.

10 MR. BOULARD: Member Krieger?

11 MEMBER KRIEGER: Yes.

12 MR. BOULARD: Member Ghannam?

13 MEMBER GHANNAM: Yes.

14 MR. BOULARD: Member Wrobel?

15 MEMBER WROBEL: Yes.

16 MR. BOULARD: Chairman Sanghvi?

17 CHAIRPERSON SANGHVI: Yes.

18 MR. BOULARD: And Member Bauer?

19 MEMBER BAUER: Yes.

20 CHAIRPERSON SANGHVI: Thank you.

21 Now, let's begin with the agenda.

22 The first case on the agenda. I don't know

23 whether there is any representative here.

24 And the case is 09-001 for 27000 Sheraton

 

9

1 Drive, Crowne Plaza.

2 Is the applicant here? I don't see

3 anybody here, so I think we will be moving

4 to the next one.

5 And we move onto the next one on the

6 list. And that being the case with Mr.

7 Quinn.

8 MR. CASSIS: Mr. Chairman, I think I

9 may have to recuse myself since the

10 Petitioner may be heading towards the

11 Planning Commission and there could be some

12 conflict there at the time they're at the

13 Planning Commission.

14 MR. QUINN: Yes, subject to the City

15 Attorney if this variance is granted we then

16 have to file for a special land use which

17 would go through the Planning Commission

18 certainly.

19 MS. KUDLA: I would agree that you

20 should recuse yourself.

21 MR. CASSIS: I think we need to vote

22 on that? And do I need to leave the forum?

23 CHAIRPERSON SANGHVI: Well, I

24 personally have no objection to you being

 

10

1 around.

2 MR. CASSIS: Can I close my ears?

3 MS. KUDLA: Normally we would have you

4 leave the forum.

5 MR. CASSIS: Oh, okay, I'll do that.

6 Is there a motion?

7 CHAIRPERSON SANGHVI: Do I have a

8 motion to have Mr. Cassis continue on the

9 Board during this case?

10 MEMBER WROBEL: A motion to allow Mr.

11 Cassis to recuse himself from this case.

12 MEMBER BAUER: Second.

13 CHAIRPERSON SANGHVI: A motion has

14 been made and seconded. No further

15 discussion, will you call the roll.

16 MR. BOULARD: Member Bauer?

17 MEMBER BAUER: Yes.

18 MR. BOULARD: Member Sanghvi?

19 CHAIRPERSON SANGHVI: Yes.

20 MR. BOULARD: Member Wrobel?

21 MEMBER WROBEL: Yes.

22 MR. BOULARD: Member Ghannam?

23 MEMBER GHANNAM: Yes.

24 MR. BOULARD: Member Krieger?

 

11

1 MEMBER KRIEGER: Yes.

2 MR. BOULARD: Member Ibe?

3 MEMBER IBE: Yes.

4 CHAIRPERSON SANGHVI: Okay.

5 MR. QUINN: Sorry, Victor, on your

6 first case.

7 CHAIRPERSON SANGHVI: All right. Now

8 that we have dealt with that, let's begin

9 with the issue here. In case number 09-002

10 filed by Matthew Quinn for 43000 West Nine

11 Mile Road. Mr. Quinn is requesting an

12 exception from Section 1903.0 to allow an

13 automotive service use adjacent to a

14 residential district, to request

15 consideration by the Planning Commission, in

16 accordance with 1903.0 for a special land

17 use. The property is zoned I-1 and is

18 located north of Nine Mile Road and east of

19 Novi Road.

20 Would you like to make your

21 presentation, Mr. Quinn?

22 MR. QUINN: Yes. Thank you, Mr.

23 Chairman. Matthew Quinn. I'm appearing on

24 behalf of the property owners that own 43000

 

12

1 Nine Mile Road. That's Swad & Company. Ed

2 Swad, Jr., is here with me this evening.

3 They are the landlord. Ed, raise your hand.

4 And the tenant is the operator of the

5 business that's there Ramiah Auto. And

6 Steve Ohan (ph) is the operator. And Ram

7 (ph) is the owner of that business.

8 Now, why are we here? Because we find

9 ourselves with an adjacency that is by

10 happenstance. Under the Novi Ordinance if

11 you are allowed in an I-1 District and we

12 are an I-1 Zoning District. We happen to be

13 abutted on both sides and I will use the

14 overhead here.

15 Here is our property right here. Here

16 is Nine Mile Road. This is to the north.

17 Our property is right here. The building is

18 in white and we have I-1 to the west of us,

19 I-1 to the east of us. We have I-1 across

20 Nine Mile Road and unfortunately we have

21 this buffer with a multiple family zoning.

22 Now, this is the apartment, Saddle

23 Creek throughout here. Now, as you can see

24 and I will stick to this drawing first. The

 

13

1 parking for this building is in the rear.

2 It's 53 yards or more than a half a football

3 field from the end of the building to the 10

4 foot setback that we have there.

5 On the apartment side you also have a

6 10 foot green belt and this square

7 represents a parking structure that is

8 adjacent to us and then their apartments sit

9 back here. So, I am showing you this to

10 give you the idea of how far away the

11 building is from the property line. That

12 there is an additional buffer by the parking

13 structure before you get to any real

14 residence.

15 Now, here is what your Ordinance says.

16 If this RN-2 was I-1 we could go straight to

17 the Planning Commission and apply for a

18 special land use. But because we are an I-2

19 adjacent to residential, your Ordinance says

20 we can't do that. So, in order to go to the

21 Planning Commission and obtain the

22 application for special land use, we need to

23 have the variance granted that allows us to

24 be an I-2 use basically adjacent -- I mean,

 

14

1 sorry I-1 use adjacent to an I-1 property.

2 That is really the variance and I think

3 that's what Mr. Boulard and I kind of worked

4 out when we were talking about this

5 application. That would be the process.

6 So, I guess unlike typically where you

7 might put in certain conditions yourself on

8 granting a variance, you are really not

9 going to do that because that's going to

10 come with the special use process when we

11 proceed forward through the Planning

12 Commission.

13 Now, within this building what has

14 happened is my client, the tenant has been

15 operating a repair business there for a

16 couple of years. It was not known to he or

17 the owner of the property that this was not

18 a permitted use because of the adjacency to

19 residential. During this two-year period

20 that this business has been there they --

21 Oh, and by the way. They do only business

22 by referral.

23 Steve happens to be one of the only,

24 if not the only Indian mechanic in the area

 

15

1 and all of the business he gets is from the

2 Indian community referring to him. He has

3 no signs. There is not even a sign on the

4 door. He just uses the two units now for

5 his business.

6 Now, the units that he

7 is in, this is a layout and these, of

8 course, were in your packets. Again, this

9 shows Nine Mile Road here. It shows there

10 is offices upfront. This is the Novi

11 Commons property at the address. And then

12 it has bays that are used by individual

13 businesses. Now, here is the rear of the

14 property and the apartment complexes are

15 near. There is a very large double unit

16 here on the end that is rented out by

17 another person and then the tenant uses 307

18 and 308. These two units right here. Now,

19 this business is operated in an enclosed

20 building. The bays where any vehicles might

21 come and go are adjacent to the I-1. So

22 they do not in any way open up towards the

23 residential area. They are totally to the

24 east and would be adjacent to I-1. The

 

16

1 pedestrian access they're on the west of

2 these two units. So, these two units are

3 where the businesses operate within.

4 Now, the type of business that is

5 operated there is minor repairs. It's not a

6 bump shop. There is no heavy duty repair

7 work there. They're a specialist in minor

8 vehicle repairs, minor engine repairs. They

9 do electrical work on cars. They do not do

10 any painting of vehicles. They don't do any

11 heavy bump work. They don't do any

12 windshield replacement or anything like

13 that.

14 In fact, when the owner, Mr. Swad was

15 going around to the other businesses in the

16 complex, he found that, yes, there were a

17 couple of other tenants that used this

18 business because they like to drive to work,

19 drive their cars down a couple of bays and

20 have it taken care of while they were there

21 be it some minor repair or electrical

22 matter. The other tenants didn't even know

23 that it exited there. That's basically how

24 quiet it is within the confines of these two

 

17

1 units. The good thing is is that it's

2 separated as I said from any residential

3 area by both half a football field and a

4 double unit before you ever get to their two

5 units.

6 Now, this Novi Commons is not doing

7 all that well. Of course, in this economy

8 it's not usual. Only about half of Novi

9 Commons is leased out and Mr. Swad's company

10 really can't afford to lose two units. He

11 honestly told me when we had our meeting, he

12 said if I lose two more units I might as

13 well give it back because it's not worth it

14 for me to keep anymore. Sometimes that is

15 something you want to just listen to,

16 sometimes it's not, but it's, in fact, the

17 reality of what's happening right now.

18 We also have obtained and submitted

19 with our documentation three letters from

20 businesses within the complex that are in

21 favor. What's important is one of them is

22 adjacent 309. We have 307, 308. The 309

23 unit is in favor of it staying there.

24 Now, within your purview, you have to

 

18

1 look at a number of things certainly.

2 Practical difficulties of this situation.

3 The practical difficulty here is we have a

4 building that's an I-1 use and it's just

5 happenstance it happened to be next to a

6 multiple family. I don't really remember

7 which came first or second, but as I think

8 back I think the apartments came second.

9 The businesses on Nine Mile were first at

10 that point in time so they were there before

11 this existed.

12 Is this business in this location

13 going to have any effect on the surrounding

14 property values or property owners? I would

15 propose not. We actually have consent from

16 some of the adjacent property owners. Is

17 there going to be really any effect on the

18 light, air, noise for that residential

19 community? No. They are so far away, both

20 with a half a football field away. Their

21 parking structure before you ever get to any

22 of the apartments, they are not going to be

23 in that particular type of circumstance.

24 So, by granting this variance, it's

 

19

1 going to be limited to this piece of

2 property. It's not going to have the effect

3 of being any type of precedent for anyone

4 else that comes here because it's limited to

5 the facts and circumstances of this

6 particular property as it exist today.

7 So, we would ask that you grant the

8 variance that would allow us then to proceed

9 to the special use process through the

10 Planning Commission. And myself and my

11 clients are more than happy to be here to

12 answer any questions that you might have as

13 you go through your deliberations. So,

14 thank you very much.

15 CHAIRPERSON SANGHVI: Thank you, Mr.

16 Quinn.

17 Does anyone in the audience wish to

18 address the Board regarding this case? I

19 don't see any. So we will close the public

20 remarks section.

21 Madam Secretary, are there any

22 correspondence regarding this case?

23 MEMBER KRIEGER: In case number:

24 09-002, 82 notices were mailed. One

 

20

1 response. Seven mail returned.

2 And the one response is John Dean of

3 (inaudible). "As a property owner two

4 blocks away I have no problem with allowing

5 an exception to Section 1903.0. The open

6 bays of 4300 West Nine Mile Road face east

7 towards other businesses so noise will not

8 be directed at residential properties. It is

9 my opinion that an automotive service

10 facility will not impact residents to the

11 north in a negative manner." Sincerely

12 yours, John Dean, President.

13 CHAIRPERSON SANGHVI: Thank you.

14 Building Department?

15 MS. KUDLA: Mr. Chair, I would just

16 like to say that this would be a standard

17 for a use variance. So, you are looking for

18 a more stringent standard which is

19 unnecessarily hardship. The Building

20 Department has put those standards in its

21 memorandum, the elements of unnecessary

22 hardship. So, rather than a practical

23 difficulty you are going to want to confine

24 your consideration to these considerations.

 

21

1 A through D.

2 CHAIRPERSON SANGHVI: Thank you. Do

3 you have anything to add?

4 MR. BOULARD: Just a question for Mr.

5 Quinn.

6 Could you give the Board a rough

7 estimate of the distance between the suite

8 that's being proposed or being proposed for

9 the automotive use and the nearest

10 residential unit?

11 MR. QUINN: That would be -- let me

12 ask the question. Approximately how wide is

13 that last unit sitting on the end of the

14 building? Is that a double unit?

15 MR. SWAD: It actually faces north and

16 south. It's about 1,400 square feet. It's

17 probably an additional -- let me get some

18 estimates here.

19 MR. QUINN: Hang on. I might have a

20 bigger drawing that answers that question

21 come to think of it.

22 MR. SWAD: I would estimate a good 30

23 to 40 feet because those units on the north

24 side of it run north and south. So, it goes

 

22

1 deep, whereas the units from 301 to 308 go

2 east west.

3 MR. BOULARD: I guess from looking at

4 the drawings that you provided it appears --

5 MR. QUINN: About 40 feet if I took a

6 guess from this scale drawing here that I

7 have.

8 MR. BOULARD: So somewhere in the

9 neighborhood of 40 feet from the automotive

10 repair units to the back of the building?

11 MR. QUINN: Correct.

12 MR. BOULARD: A 150 feet to the

13 property line and then another how far to

14 the actual occupied residential area?

15 MR. QUINN: About another half a

16 football field. So, you're whole football

17 field plus another 40 feet away.

18 MR. BOULARD: So, 340 feet?

19 MR. QUINN: Right.

20 MR. BOULARD: Approximately?

21 MR. QUINN: Yes.

22 MR. BOULARD: The only other comment I

23 had was just to repeat. The Planning

24 Commission, it will be in their purview to

 

23

1 put any restrictions on the types of uses,

2 noises (inaudible). The ZBA at this point

3 is just, the question before us is whether

4 to grant them permission to go before the

5 Planning Commission.

6 CHAIRPERSON SANGHVI: Thank you. Well,

7 I'll open it up to the Board now.

8 As you are all looking at it, I might

9 add myself that I have personally no

10 objection to giving this variance with an

11 understanding and a recommendation to the

12 Planning Commission that this would be only

13 for the use of this particular tenant and

14 not an open kind of variance for land use

15 for everybody that comes into that complex.

16 MR. QUINN: That's understood.

17 CHAIRPERSON SANGHVI: Yes, Mr. Bauer?

18 MEMBER BAUER: Mr. Quinn?

19 MR. QUINN: Yes.

20 MEMBER BAUER: If this is so passed by

21 the Board, please emphasize upon them no

22 outside parking at night.

23 MR. QUINN: Yes, absolutely.

24 MEMBER BAUER: We have plenty of them

 

24

1 that do the parking outside and that's a

2 real pain in the neck.

3 MR. QUINN: I can promise you, Mr.

4 Bauer, we have discussed that about moving

5 any vehicles inside. And since they have

6 double bays they should be able to handle

7 that. And they understand and I have

8 impressed upon them having gone through that

9 with other clients that that's a nightmare

10 and they will be back here if there is

11 violations.

12 MEMBER BAUER: Thank you very much.

13 MEMBER GHANNAM: I just have a couple

14 of questions. What type of noise does this

15 business make?

16 MR. QUINN: Muffled. Basically when

17 they take a tire off, they unscrew a door

18 panel -- and you can correct me if I'm wrong

19 -- unscrew a door panel, put a door panel

20 back on. That's about the loudest noise

21 that goes on.

22 MEMBER GHANNAM: When they operate

23 during the regular business hours is the

24 interior exposed to the outside? In other

 

25

1 words, are the bays open or how does that

2 work?

3 MR. QUINN: No, no. The bays, and

4 this is another thing I've gone over with

5 them. Independent of what's happened here,

6 your Ordinance requires business to operate

7 in a totally enclosed structure and,

8 therefore, those doors are to be closed.

9 MEMBER GHANNAM: That's all I have.

10 Thank you.

11 CHAIRPERSON SANGHVI: Thank you. Yes,

12 Mr. Wrobel?

13 MEMBER WROBEL: What are the hours of

14 operation?

15 MR. OHAN: 8 a.m. to 7 p.m.

16 MR. QUINN: 8 a.m. to 7 p.m.

17 MEMBER WROBEL: How many day a weeks?

18 MR. QUINN: Six days?

19 MR. OHAN: Six days.

20 MR. QUINN: Six days. Monday through

21 Saturday.

22 MEMBER WROBEL: I am looking right

23 here at the elements of unnecessary

24 hardship. I would just like to go through

 

26

1 them briefly and let's see if they apply.

2 Number one is that the property cannot be

3 reasonably used for purposes permitted in

4 the zoning district, i.e., property will not

5 yield a reasonable return. No.

6 MR. QUINN: Not given what's happening

7 right now.

8 MEMBER WROBEL: We can't be concerned

9 with economic conditions in the state today

10 because obviously they can change tomorrow

11 God willing.

12 B, that the plight of property owner

13 is not due to unique circumstances peculiar

14 to his or her property and not the general

15 neighborhood conditions. No. Third one,

16 that the use variance will not alter the

17 essential character of the area. No. And

18 that the proponent's problem is not self

19 created. It is self created.

20 I just wanted to read those. We have

21 to take those into consideration in making a

22 motion and making a decision about it. I

23 will wait to hear what other people have to

24 say. Thank you.

 

27

1 CHAIRPERSON SANGHVI: Any more

2 comments? Mr. Ibe?

3 MEMBER IBE: Mr. Quinn?

4 MR. QUINN: Yes, sir.

5 MEMBER IBE: The only thing I'm

6 struggling with is really you are trying to

7 meet the elements that is required of this

8 body to allow this to go forward. I do

9 understand the prevailing economic

10 conditions not just in the city of Novi but

11 across the United States which we are all

12 optimistic that things will improve. And if

13 that were to be true, then obviously the

14 elements, number B that was mentioned by my

15 colleague, Wayne Wrobel, would certainly not

16 apply in this case.

17 But if we were to look at the

18 prevailing conditions today obviously it

19 would fit in with what your client is

20 looking for. But I have some reservation.

21 As much as I want this to go forward I

22 certainly want it to, but I do have some

23 reservation. Is there any way that you can

24 obviously perhaps through the -- I believe

 

28

1 it's the owner?

2 MR. QUINN: Mr. Swad?

3 MEMBER IBE: Mr. Swad can explain

4 exactly. The units that are currently

5 available there are empty, I think you said

6 it's about 50 units?

7 MR. QUINN: About 50 percent.

8 MEMBER IBE: What are the prospects of

9 anyone getting those units in the last two

10 years? Have they had any inquiries made by

11 anyone?

12 MR. QUINN: Sure. Ed, you want to

13 come up?

14 MR. SWAD: Sure.

15 MR. QUINN: You got to get sworn in.

16 CHAIRPERSON SANGHVI: Is he an

17 attorney, Mr. Quinn?

18 MR. QUINN: No.

19 MR. SWAD: I'm only a CPA.

20 CHAIRPERSON SANGHVI: Can you kindly

21 identify yourself and be sworn in by our

22 Secretary, please.

23 MEMBER KRIEGER: In case number:

24 09-002 do you swear or affirm to tell the

 

29

1 truth in this case?

2 MR. SWAD: Yes, I do.

3 MR. QUINN: The question was what's

4 been the activity in your building within

5 the last couple of years.

6 MR. SWAD: Okay. If you would take a

7 look at the building it's laid out in a

8 couple -- this is the industrial unit going

9 here. This part is office. So, in the

10 office part there has been significant

11 decreases of office use. There are 52

12 separate offices upfront here. There is

13 about 14,000 square feet and the entire

14 first floor on the east side has been

15 vacated in the last year and then on the

16 upper level, second floor on the east side

17 there has been significant vacancies there

18 within the last year as well.

19 There has been two tenants that have

20 come in in the last twelve months, each of

21 them renting one 12 by 12 office space up

22 there. Now, separately in the back here,

23 unit 306 directly adjacent to the tenant has

24 come in and signed a one-year lease. They

 

30

1 are in the process of winding their business

2 down. They were previously located in Troy.

3 They are down-sized to this location which

4 is about 2,700 square feet and they only

5 signed a one-year lease because they will

6 have their process of liquidation completed

7 in the 12 months.

8 The unit next to it is vacant. No

9 activity in the five years that I have owned

10 the building. 304 is a tenant in there and

11 has been there since I bought the building

12 five years ago. 303 is vacant and has been

13 vacant. And 302 and 301 are occupied.

14 Now, back here there are five units.

15 This shows as one but really there are doors

16 that separate this part into five separate

17 units. There has been two vacancies that

18 happened within the last 12 months that

19 tenants have left. Basically just went out

20 of business and couldn't afford the rent

21 anymore so they have vacated.

22 MEMBER IBE: Thank you, Mr. Chair.

23 CHAIRPERSON SANGHVI: Thank you, Mr.

24 Ibe. Yes, Ms. Krieger?

 

31

1 MEMBER KRIEGER: In light of the

2 economics that we can't really look at, the

3 problem not being self created. If we can

4 look at it in a light where it created

5 itself or it's self created -- never mind.

6 That the proponent's problem is not self

7 created is what I'm trying to think through.

8 That the proponent has this thing that's

9 working. We've got a building that's got

10 other vacancies, so to assist use of

11 building in Novi to have businesses and have

12 a unique circumstance that can be alleviated

13 with the variance request that would have

14 guidelines not to cause any distress to

15 neighboring residents, that I would support

16 looking at a variance.

17 CHAIRPERSON SANGHVI: Thank you. Yes,

18 Mr. Ghannam?

19 MEMBER GHANNAM: I also would concur.

20 I generally support a variance in this

21 matter. However, it would have to be

22 subject to all of the restrictions that they

23 would submit which is on page two of their

24 attachment. The third or fourth section

 

32

1 down such as no vehicle paintings, no

2 parking outside. With those restrictions

3 along with obviously subject to Planning

4 Commission requirements and so forth, so I

5 would be in favor for something like that

6 and good for only this particular time.

7 CHAIRPERSON SANGHVI: Thank you.

8 Well, do I hear a motion then?

9 MEMBER GHANNAM: I will go ahead and

10 make a motion at this time that in ZBA case

11 number: 09-002 filed by Matthew Quinn for

12 43000 West Nine Mile Road on behalf of the

13 owner and the tenant that we grant relief

14 from Section 1902 of the Zoning Ordinance

15 restricting the ability to put this

16 particular type of business within this

17 district and allowing the petitioners to go

18 before the Planning Commission and get

19 whatever relief they need there. Due to the

20 unnecessary hardships explained and

21 demonstrated by the petitioner, illustrating

22 that the property cannot be reasonably used

23 for the purpose permitted in the zoning

24 district. The plight of the property owner

 

33

1 is due to the unique circumstances peculiar

2 to the property and not to the general

3 neighborhood. I believe the variance will

4 not alter the essential character of the

5 area and the problem is not self created.

6 This would be again subject to the

7 self imposed restrictions that they agreed

8 to on page two of their submission and good

9 for this tenant and also subject to any

10 requirements of the Planning Commission.

11 MEMBER KRIEGER: Second.

12 CHAIRPERSON SANGHVI: The motion has

13 been made and seconded.

14 MS. KUDLA: Could I make a suggestion

15 that we probably need to add a couple of

16 specific facts as far as the element of

17 unnecessary hardship as to why the Board is

18 seeing it as unique circumstances and not

19 peculiar, that type of thing, some

20 specifics.

21 MEMBER GHANNAM: Well, I can state

22 because I live not too far from this area

23 actually that there are no businesses of a

24 similar nature nearby. I think it's

 

34

1 actually a better place to put a repair shop

2 as opposed to seeing a garage filled with

3 cars making the area look more blighted. I

4 think it's set back reasonably well. It's

5 not close to any residential neighbor that

6 would certainly create any noise or odors

7 and things of that nature. And I think that

8 given the support of their neighbors that it

9 would be reasonably fit for this particular

10 purpose.

11 CHAIRPERSON SANGHVI: Okay. Yes, Mr.

12 Bauer?

13 MEMBER BAUER: You mentioned 1902. It

14 should be 1903.

15 MEMBER GHANNAM: Yes, you are right.

16 I apologize. It is Section 1903.0. With

17 that amendment.

18 CHAIRPERSON SANGHVI: All right, now

19 we have got the correct number and

20 everything, section number and all that.

21 Very good.

22 Any further discussion? Seeing none,

23 will you please call the roll.

24 MR. BOULARD: Member Wrobel?

 

35

1 MEMBER WROBEL: Yes.

2 MR. BOULARD: Chairman Sanghvi?

3 CHAIRPERSON SANGHVI: Yes.

4 MR. BOULARD: Member Krieger?

5 MEMBER KRIEGER: Yes.

6 MR. BOULARD: Member Ibe?

7 MEMBER IBE: Yes.

8 MR. BOULARD: Member Ghannam?

9 MEMBER GHANNAM: Yes.

10 MR. BOULARD: Member Bauer?

11 MEMBER BAUER: Yes.

12 MR. BOULARD: Motion passes 6-0.

13 CHAIRPERSON SANGHVI: Congratulations.

14 MR. QUINN: Thank you very much. I

15 appreciate your consideration.

16 CHAIRPERSON SANGHVI: Off to the

17 Planning Commission.

18 MR. QUINN: Our job is just beginning.

19 Thank you.

20 CHAIRPERSON SANGHVI: Thank you. Now,

21 I wonder if the first applicant has arrived

22 or not. I will call case number: 09-001

23 filed by Thomas Asmar for Crowne Plaza --

24 oh, you have arrived. Very good.

 

36

1 MEMBER GHANNAM: Someone needs to get

2 Mr. Cassis.

3 CHAIRPERSON SANGHVI: We can get Mr.

4 Cassis back. Welcome back.

5 MR. CASSIS: Thank you.

6 CHAIRPERSON SANGHVI: All right, sir.

7 Would you state your name and address and be

8 sworn in by our Secretary before you can

9 make your presentation.

10 MR. ASMAR: Thomas Asmar, 27000

11 Sheraton Drive.

12 MEMBER KRIEGER: Do you swear or

13 affirm in case number: 09-001, 27000

14 Sheraton Drive for Crowne Plaza to tell the

15 truth in this case?

16 MR. ASMAR: Yes.

17 MEMBER KRIEGER: Thank you.

18 CHAIRPERSON SANGHVI: Go ahead.

19 MR. ASMAR: I am proposing, actually

20 we've already put the sign up on our facade.

21 We've constructed a new facade at the Crowne

22 Plaza. I am sure you guys know the

23 location. It's a unique situation where we

24 put a new facade up and we put a little sign

 

37

1 made out of like stucco saying Crowne Plaza.

2 I know all you guys have a picture of it.

3 I think the people who constructed it

4 thought that they were able to put that sign

5 up since it was so small. So now we got a

6 violation for it. We got a citation for it.

7 So now I am coming in front of you guys to

8 see what we could do by leaving it up there.

9 CHAIRPERSON SANGHVI: That's it?

10 Anything else?

11 MR. ASMAR: That's pretty much it.

12 CHAIRPERSON SANGHVI: Would you like

13 to show what the sign or facade change looks

14 like and put it on the screen?

15 MR. ASMAR: Actually I did not bring

16 it with me.

17 CHAIRPERSON SANGHVI: So that you can

18 show it to the people at home.

19 MR. ASMAR: I did not bring it with

20 me. I'm sorry.

21 MEMBER BAUER: He is going to show it.

22 CHAIRPERSON SANGHVI: Okay. I don't

23 see anybody in the audience, but this is the

24 time for any public remarks. Seeing none,

 

38

1 we will move on and go on to the Secretary

2 and see if there are any correspondence

3 regarding this case.

4 MEMBER KRIEGER: In case number:

5 09-001 notices were mailed were 78. One

6 response and 12 mail returned. And the

7 response is Chris Brant (ph), VP of

8 operations, Emagine Entertainment. "Emagine

9 supports Crowne Plaza Hotel's request for

10 the additional signage." And that's it.

11 CHAIRPERSON SANGHVI: Thank you.

12 Building Department?

13 MR. BOULARD: Thank you. In the staff

14 report I indicated there are a number of

15 variances existing for sign variances for

16 the property. Some of which, some of those

17 signs have been permitted but not installed

18 and so on.

19 MR. ASMAR: Actually we haven't put

20 any up.

21 CHAIRPERSON SANGHVI: Now you hold on,

22 sir.

23 MR. ASMAR: Oh, I'm sorry.

24 MR. BOULARD: These are from previous

 

39

1 variances and I have listed all the way back

2 to 1981. 1981, '06, '08. I tried to

3 provide a quick rundown of those. And, in

4 fact, in your packet there is a -- what we

5 did was took pictures of the signs and then

6 there is a drawing that has the locations on

7 them. I hope you can read that. Of the

8 existing signs that are out there right now.

9 The only signs that aren't there right

10 now are the ones that are labeled G and H on

11 the building which were approved under one

12 of the previous variances. I tried to

13 provide a rundown of what's approved and

14 what's out there. And we've got pictures of

15 most of those as well as the variances.

16 There is one thing I would like to

17 point out. You will notice that the

18 variance listed number 886 from July of

19 1981, the original variance to allow four

20 ground pole signs. The definitions of a

21 ground pole sign have changed in the years

22 over the Ordinance, so what is called a

23 ground pole sign in 1981 is a monument sign

24 under the current ordinance requirements.

 

40

1 So, I apologize for the confusion. But if

2 you have any questions I will be happy to do

3 my best to explain it to you.

4 CHAIRPERSON SANGHVI: Thank you.

5 Well, I'll open it to the Board now. Yes,

6 Mr. Wrobel?

7 MEMBER WROBEL: Thank you. After

8 seeing this last year, last April where we

9 approved the other sign, I personally don't

10 believe any hardship exist to allow another

11 sign. There is adequate signage for this

12 location. I just don't see a need for it at

13 this time. Thank you.

14 CHAIRPERSON SANGHVI: Yes, Mr. Bauer?

15 MEMBER BAUER: I agree with Mr.

16 Wrobel. The 18-square feet as far as I'm

17 concerned is not going to make or break you

18 one way or the other. So, I would be

19 inclined to vote against it.

20 CHAIRPERSON SANGHVI: Thank you.

21 While you are all looking at your file, I

22 might add my own personal comments. I agree

23 with what has been said. I don't think it's

24 going to add anything to it. This business

 

41

1 has adequate signage and adding one more is

2 not going to do anything extra other than

3 adding one more variance. I don't see any

4 need for it. Thank you.

5 Yes, Mr. Cassis?

6 MR. CASSIS: Thank you, Mr. Chairman.

7 Maybe my first outing I shouldn't be

8 commenting, but, you know, I think the case

9 is very clear. Do you know how high that

10 big huge sign that you have way up there

11 like 15 feet, 20 feet, how high is it?

12 MR. ASMAR: It's probably about 30

13 feet.

14 MR. CASSIS: Thirty feet. I'm counting

15 how many other signs. You've got five other

16 signs and two others coming up.

17 MR. ASMAR: I see the way that the

18 Board is going right now --

19 MR. CASSIS: I didn't ask you

20 anything.

21 Mr. Chairman, I know it's hard times,

22 but I remember this. I have been around

23 here a long time to know the Sheraton used

24 to be here. The same hotel that you are in

 

42

1 right now used to be called the Sheraton.

2 They didn't have all those signs and they

3 were still doing big business. It's very

4 unfortunate that the place of that hotel is

5 at that juncture of that area there. But I

6 don't see, with all the signs that the city

7 has also directing people towards your

8 place, so, really, I really don't see that

9 one more sign 4 feet by 4 feet in that spot

10 is going to really bring you more customers.

11 And plus, Mr. Chairman, hotels get their

12 guests mainly probably 80% or so, 90%, I

13 don't know what the percent is from internet

14 or calling or if they are Crowne Plaza they

15 belong to an association of Crowne Plaza and

16 people they do their commitments through

17 that means rather than just driving around

18 and saying, oh, here's a Crowne Plaza. For

19 all of those reason I don't think that sign

20 is really necessary. Thank you.

21 CHAIRPERSON SANGHVI: Thank you, Mr.

22 Cassis. May I hear a motion from some Board

23 member?

24 MEMBER WROBEL: Okay, I'll take a stab

 

43

1 at it. In the matter of case: 09-001,

2 27000 Sheraton Drive, Crowne Plaza, deny the

3 request for additional signage. The

4 applicant has not proven an undue hardship

5 by not placing additional signs at this

6 time.

7 MEMBER BAUER: Second.

8 MS. KUDLA: Can I amend that it's a

9 practical difficulty rather than hardship.

10 MEMBER WROBEL: That's okay. So

11 amended.

12 MEMBER BAUER: I'll second it.

13 CHAIRPERSON SANGHVI: All right. The

14 motion has been made and seconded.

15 Did you get the name?

16 MR. BOULARD: Who seconded the motion?

17 CHAIRPERSON SANGHVI: Mr. Bauer.

18 MR. BOULARD: Thank you.

19 CHAIRPERSON SANGHVI: Any further

20 discussion? Seeing none, will you please

21 call the roll.

22 MR. BOULARD: Certainly. Member

23 Bauer?

24 MEMBER BAUER: Yes.

 

44

1 MR. BOULARD: Member Cassis?

2 MEMBER CASSIS: Yes.

3 MR. BOULARD: Member Ghannam?

4 MEMBER GHANNAM: Yes.

5 MR. BOULARD: Member Ibe?

6 MEMBER IBE: Yes.

7 MR. BOULARD: Member Krieger?

8 MEMBER KRIEGER: Yes.

9 MR. BOULARD: Chairman Sanghvi?

10 CHAIRPERSON SANGHVI: Yes.

11 MR. BOULARD: Member Wrobel?

12 MEMBER WROBEL: Yes.

13 MR. BOULARD: Motion to deny is

14 approved 7-0.

15 MR. ASMAR: Could I say something?

16 CHAIRPERSON SANGHVI: I think the case

17 is closed. We made our decision. Thank

18 you.

19 I think that finishes our cases this

20 evening and we will go on to the other

21 business. The other business is the

22 election of officers over the coming year.

23 And if the Board pleases we will do this by

24 going one by one for each position. Chair,

 

45

1 Vice-Chair, Secretary. If there is a

2 consensus about that. If so -- Yes, sir?

3 MEMBER BAUER: I just wish to have you

4 as the Chairman for this next year. I put

5 your hat in the ring.

6 CHAIRPERSON SANGHVI: Is anybody

7 seconding your proposition? It has to be

8 seconded.

9 MR. CASSIS: Second. Yeah, I second

10 it.

11 CHAIRPERSON SANGHVI: The proposal has

12 been made and seconded. Any other

13 nomination?

14 MEMBER IBE: Mr. Chair, can I add one

15 more name to the Chair just to mix it up a

16 little bit? How about Wayne Wrobel for

17 Chair. I don't know if he is going to be

18 interested or not.

19 MEMBER GHANNAM: I'll second it.

20 CHAIRPERSON SANGHVI: It has been

21 seconded. So, we have two people names have

22 been put forward. And we haven't had this

23 situation before. But how would you like to

24 vote on it? Would you like to do a voice

 

46

1 vote or would you like to write down names

2 on a piece of paper?

3 MS. KUDLA: A voice vote, actually I

4 guess a roll call vote would probably be

5 good on this so we can distinguish how many

6 votes there are one way or the other.

7 CHAIRPERSON SANGHVI: Okay. Whichever

8 way is the right way of doing it. I have no

9 problem. So, go ahead and do a voice vote

10 one by one?

11 MEMBER KRIEGER: Question? Can we

12 write it down like they have on council

13 ballots?

14 CHAIRPERSON SANGHVI: Yeah, that's

15 what I thought you can write down the name

16 on a piece of paper.

17 MS. KUDLA: We can do it as two

18 separate motions.

19 MR. BOULARD: Could they just write

20 the names on a scrap of paper?

21 MS. KUDLA: Let me look at the rules

22 of order.

23 CHAIRPERSON SANGHVI: I have never

24 faced this before, so I don't know of the

 

47

1 situation.

2 MS. KUDLA: We could have you make a

3 motion to take the vote by secret ballot.

4 And then if the motion is approved to vote

5 by secret ballot and it can be done by

6 secret ballot.

7 MEMBER BAUER: I move to take the vote

8 by secret ballot.

9 MEMBER IBE: I'll second that.

10 MR. BOULARD: Do we need a vote on

11 that?

12 MS. KUDLA: It doesn't have to be a

13 roll call.

14 CHAIRPERSON SANGHVI: All those in

15 favor of a secret ballot please signify by

16 saying aye?

17 BOARD MEMBERS: Aye.

18 CHAIRPERSON SANGHVI: Ayes have it.

19 Mr. Boulard, would you like to collect it

20 and give it to the counsel there?

21 MR. BOULARD: I would be happy to.

22 MS. KUDLA: For a secret ballot it

23 appears you have to appoint tellers. People

24 who are uninterested in the results of the

 

48

1 vote. We could have two tellers for them to

2 review the ballots just to make sure

3 accuracy.

4 MEMBER GHANNAM: We appoint you two.

5 Just so you're official.

6 MR. BOULARD: Is there a second?

7 MEMBER IBE: I'll second that.

8 MEMBER GHANNAM: All in favor?

9 BOARD MEMBERS: Aye.

10 MR. BOULARD: Now we can look.

11 MS. KUDLA: The results are in favor

12 of Mav Sanghvi for Chair.

13 CHAIRPERSON SANGHVI: Thank you.

14 Moving on to the next -- yes, Member Bauer?

15 MEMBER BAUER: I wish Mr. Wrobel to be

16 put into Vice-chair.

17 MEMBER GHANNAM: I'll second that.

18 CHAIRPERSON SANGHVI: The motion has

19 been made and seconded.

20 Any other nominations? Seeing none, I

21 think Mr. Wrobel will be elected.

22 MEMBER CASSIS: I second.

23 CHAIRPERSON SANGHVI: Thank you.

24 MR. BOULARD: Do we need a vote?

 

49

1 MS. KUDLA: Yes.

2 CHAIRPERSON SANGHVI: All those in

3 favor of Mr. Wrobel's nomination as the

4 Vice-chair please signify by saying aye?

5 BOARD MEMBERS: Aye.

6 CHAIRPERSON SANGHVI: Those opposed

7 same sign.

8 Now the next position of the

9 Secretary. I would like to nominate Mr.

10 Bauer for the position of the Secretary.

11 MEMBER CASSIS: I second.

12 CHAIRPERSON SANGHVI: The nomination

13 has been made and seconded duly.

14 Are there any other nominations for

15 the position? Seeing none, all those in

16 favor of accepting Mr. Bauer's nomination as

17 Secretary please signify by saying aye?

18 BOARD MEMBERS: Aye.

19 CHAIRPERSON SANGHVI: Those opposed

20 same sign?

21 MEMBER BAUER: (Inaudible.)

22 CHAIRPERSON SANGHVI: You got it Mr.

23 Bauer. Thank you. If this is no other

24 business I would like to -- Yes, Mr.

 

50

1 Wrobel?

2 MEMBER WROBEL: Thank you, Mr. Chair.

3 I would just like to have on the record,

4 unfortunately he didn't come tonight, but I

5 would like to congratulate Mr. Amolsch on

6 his retirement and thank him for all his

7 help on the ZBA. He has been really helpful

8 and I hope he enjoys his retirement. I envy

9 him.

10 (Interposing.)(Inaudible.)

11 CHAIRPERSON SANGHVI: Anything else

12 for the good of the Board? Seeing none, may

13 I have a motion to adjourn?

14 MEMBER BAUER: So moved.

15 MEMBER GHANNAM: I'll second that.

16 CHAIRPERSON SANGHVI: All those in

17 favor signify by saying aye?

18 BOARD MEMBERS: Aye.

19 CHAIRPERSON SANGHVI: Good-bye.

20 (The meeting was adjourned at

21 7:57 p.m.)

22

23

24

 

51

1 C E R T I F I C A T E

2

3

4 I, Mona L. Talton, do hereby certify

5 that I have recorded stenographically the

6 proceedings had and testimony taken in the

7 above-entitled matter at the time and place

8 hereinbefore set forth, and I do further

9 certify that the foregoing transcript,

10 consisting of (43) typewritten pages, is a

11 true and correct transcript of my said

12 stenographic notes.

13

14

15

16

17

18 _____________________________

19 Mona L. Talton,

20 Certified Shorthand Reporter

21

22 February 26, 2009

23

24